Archive | Advertising RSS feed for this section

The top 5 wireless ads: T-Mobile outspent AT&T, Verizon and Sprint in TV advertisements in July

25 Aug

FierceWireless has partnered with TV advertising measurement firm to bring you a monthly snapshot of the wireless industry’s advertising spending.

In July, the nation’s wireless carriers spent an estimated $183.4 million on TV advertising, down $450,000 from June. T-Mobile led the way with 23.2 percent of that total, taking over the lead held by AT&T in June. T-Mobile’s spending was spread across 12 different ads shown a total of around 6,000 times.

But AT&T came in a close second with 21.2 percent of July’s spending. AT&T’s spending was spread across 14 ads shown a total of around 10,000 times. Verizon Wireless came in third with 19.8 percent of the total; Verizon was third in June also.

Here is a breakdown of how much each carrier spent to show TV ads during July:

Although T-Mobile spent the most money during July on TV advertisements, Verizon spent the most on any single ad. Verizon spent $21.4 million across a range of channels and TV programs during July to show its “Magnificent Geese” spot. Sprint’s “Followers” ad followed with $20.5 million, and T-Mobile’s “Mobile Without Borders” was third with $14.5 million.

Here are the top 5 ads for July in terms of total spending:

  1. Verizon “Magnificent Geese” ($21.4 million)
  2. Sprint “Followers” ($20.5 million)
  1. T-Mobile “Mobile Without Borders” ($14.5 million)
  1. AT&T “Life Simulator” ($14 million)
  2. T-Mobile “Never Settle for Verizon” ($12.3 million)

Almost $80 million of the spending by wireless carriers in July on TV advertisements went to the Big Four broadcast networks (Fox, NBC, CBS and ABC), with TNT breaking into the top 5 with $6.8 million.

And what TV shows did the nation’s wireless carriers pay to put their advertisements into? That statistic generally tracks alongside the nation’s most popular TV shows, but notable examples of the most popular TV shows among the CMOs at wireless carriers included America’s Got Talent with $7.2 million in total spending by wireless carriers, followed by American Ninja Warrior with $5 million, and the 2015 MLB All-Star Game at $4.1 million.

To obtain its data, said its proprietary technology tracks TV commercials, movie trailers and show promotions across the top 111 networks in real-time. The company’s software constantly watches these networks, using proprietary audio and video fingerprinting algorithms to automatically identify and extract TV commercials, movie trailers and show promos. On the digital screen, the company tracks 710.2 million explicit interactions with TV ads across 101.5 million unique consumers per month. These interactions include video plays, searches and social activity. The company also analyzes online views across YouTube and, searches on Google, Bing and Yahoo! and social activity on Facebook (including Facebook private) and Twitter. said it tags over 40 different dimensions of metadata, including brand, agency, actors, products, songs, moods, URLs and other pertinent data, to create its results.

Relflecting Back – Does Viewability Matter and the Future of Check In’s?

18 Dec

My blogging has taken a real dip since the arrival of my 2 girls but as I had a few minutes I’d reflect on past posts while sharing my thoughts on 2015.

I’ve been reading some of my old blogs and I get a kick out some of things that I wrote in the past.

January 3rd of 2012 I wrote an article about viewability of the ad impressions. It was just the start of what is now a full blown issue 2 years later.

On March 9th of 2011 I talked about how Check In’s are dead, and for all intense purposes they are.  When’s the last time you did that outside of facebook.  In that same posts I talked about the move to the DSP world from Ad Networks.

I really wish I was making some investments around my thoughts.

As we look to the year ahead I think we are in for an evolution of today’s trends. Here are some observations from my side.

Programmatic is projected to grow 137% this year according to emarketer.   I’m not a huge fan of the term programmatic.  I’ve tried to shift the thinking to automated buying.  The word programmatic as defined by customers means something different to everyone.  Automated buying will fundamentally shift our industry.

In addition mobile finally had it’s year.  Revenue is still behind consumption but then again standard display never hit the appropriate portion of it’s consumption.

Native is another term that our advertisers throw around with so much different meaning which is a little frustrating.  I think we need to disconnect the terms content creation and native advertising.  These are two different things.

So what does 2015 hold:

1. Shocker – automated buying will continue to grow.  I think the change here is that more and more advertisers are going to look for a unified delivery across display, mobile and video.  Few companies are positioned to deliver on this holy grail.  I think the biggest thing we see leading marketers do, is start to look at how they can deliver on the message or creative in the programmatic space, using data as the informer.

2. Mobile will have another amazing year and we are going to hit the tipping point.  We have advertisers now looking to deliver 30-50% of the media in the coming year on mobile.  We as publishers have to make this easy.  We need to deliver on dynamic page delivery that allows our advertisers media to render correctly without creating numerous sizes.   At the end of the day it is about connecting with consumers.  We need to make this easier for our advertisers.

3.  Native will go programmatic.  What I mean is these “Feed Ads” will trade like any other media.  I’m intrigued what Nativo and Sharethrough continue to do in the marketplace.  I think these companies are well positioned to take advantage of the change coming.

4.  Content Creation for advertisers needs to become it’s own bucket.  We also need to look to solve consumer needs when creating this content.  Lines are blurring on edit and advertising and if we don’t watch out we are going to put doubt that any content online is trustworthy.

5.  OLV metrics have to change.  We are continuing to get stuck in the TV metric of success.  All advertisers are looking for delivery against key age groups.  Why are advertisers continuing to push this metric?  Data is such a beautiful thing and we need to evaluate digital video differently.  My fear for advertisers as they push partners to hit these metrics and we end up in this game of auto play and never seen ads.  We need to change the conversation.

Who knows the year holds but some of the observations from my seat.  It’s always fun to look back to see if any of this really happened.

Happy Holiday’s from my family to yours.


Do Advertisers Even Care About Viewable Ad Impressions? Not Yet

3 Jan

Finally advertisers are recognizing that a high percentage of their online ads are not being seen by consumers. So of course they will demand that all impressions will need to be 100% viewable, or will they?

In August of last year adweek reported on an adsafe study that was done around viewable impressions. Most of you have read or heard of this study, but in it they said a few things.

– 51.1% of all ads are never seen in the entirety on the screen
– 58.8% of all ads running on ad networks are never seen in entirety on the screen
– 59.7 for the same numbers when buying through exchanges

Using the same requirements above and then adding an in-view window of :15 seconds the stats go to as follows:

– 78.9% of ads never seen across all publishers
– 83% of ads never seen on networks and exchanges

This explains why you see reports of online video growing at 50% for the coming year, and the CPM’s are justified.

In the past 2 months we’ve been talking to numerous advertisers about plans for 2013 and working to create marketing solutions for those advertisers. A handful of these marketers told us they were buying mostly ad networks and exchanges. This came as no surprise based on the research I had done on

As we were talking through some of the marketing challenges we discussed eCPM’s and as I expected our solution was a little more than double the eCPM’s they were paying with ad networks and exchanges. So our solution is unique in the fact that we have 100% viewable impressions and our ads run close to :15 seconds in rotation. We aren’t the only company out there guaranteeing viewable impressions, announced this last year.

So as I explained that our eCPM, with 100% viewable impressions, actually delivered a more effective advertising program, I received a few comments that were concerning. One comment made reflected the thought that it must be everyone else running on ad networks not being seen because our ads are always seen. Later that week I did see this advertiser’s ad, and it was on the bottom of a publishers homepage, and no I did not send a screenshot to them. Apparently only the other advertisers on the ad networks and exchanges are not being seen. The other answer was even a more disturbing was that this advertiser need to keep their CPM’s at these levels regardless of viewability.

One of these advertisers does last view and last click attribution, which means you have platforms where people are never seeing an ad, and taking action, and these ad networks are getting credit.

As I sat back and thought about these responses a couple things come to mind
– How many of these people were able to move up the corporate ladder by driving price down and delivering perceived value
– Do they fully understand the impact on marketing in regards to viewability
– Should I just dump a ton of ads that are unviewable to drive down my eCPM (Would never do this, not fair to our partners)

I realize 2 advertisers is not a strong sample size, and I hope they are the exception to the rule, but it got me thinking what will advertisers do if CPM’s spike based on viewability. Are they going to demand the same rates? Maybe they can demand the same rates based on the amount of impressions available.

I do believe banner commoditization has occurred, and you must have unique differentiation to have any chance of selling banners at a premium. Our company continues to move to more native experiences but banners have shown to play a role in effecting consumer behavior.

The first chapter is being written on ad viewability and I look forward to seeing where the story ends. I selfishly hope that all publishers are forced to have 100% viewable impressions from advertisers because this can only help marketers at the same time rewarding companies like ours who are doing right by advertisers.

Why I left Yahoo to join Solohealth

17 Jul

If I had a dollar for every time I’ve been asked in the past 3 weeks why I’m leaving Yahoo or where are you going, I’d be a little wealthier. That being said, figured the easiest and fastest way to address this is to add it to the blog.

First, if you came here to read about the skewering and downfall of Yahoo you can stop reading. That is not what this is. Yahoo provided me with opportunities and education that I’m not sure I could have gotten elsewhere. I’ve met some of the most intelligent people in the digital space over that time and established friendships that will last forever. I’m not naming names because honestly it would take too long. Sure, Yahoo has it challenges but a lot of companies are envious of the position Yahoo is in. This was about the opportunity that presented itself.

I’ve been working in digital media sales since 1998, and because of this my phone rings quite often from recruiters. I’ve had people reach out for opportunities big and small. Major social sites, gaming sites, content creation and others have expressed interest. I decided that when/if I moved I wanted go to a real small startup that provided me an opportunity to grow, be challenged and utilize all my interests.

Solohealth fit that criteria, plus a few others.

The things I was seeking in the next company were as follows:

  1.  Is the product uniquely differentiated
  2. Can it cause disruption in the market
  3. Is it focused

So for those wondering what Solohealth is, I will do my best to sum it up after 1 week.

“We help businesses engage consumers with precision targeted media and content integration, through various health assessments that occur inside retailers stores.” (Yes, it needs work, but that is where I’m at) Consumers are literally logging onto the web at stores like Wal-Mart, Publix, Sam’s Club, CVS and others I can’t mention, and doing health assessments on areas like BMI, Blood Pressure, Vision, Pain Management and others.

Anyone that knows me understands my unique interest in working with CPG manufacturers. I’ve always said half the battle is getting the consumer into the store; the other half is to get them to buy. Well we’ve eliminated the first barrier and depending on the studies you read 65-75% of all purchase decisions happen inside the store.

This solution can help so many businesses ranging from OTC, Pharma, CPG and even companies like Subway and McDonald’s which operate restaurants in Wal-Mart as well as I’m sure a 100 other categories I haven’t thought of yet.

The other thing that appealed to me was our ability to actually work with businesses to integrate content and questions right within the assessments. I can go on and on about the opportunities but that is for another post.

I’ve enjoyed the startups I’ve been part of before, going all the way back to Citysearch in 1998 or when we opened the WebMD office in Chicago. My passion for product development, sales, true measurement at retail, building a team from the ground up has all come together in this role.

I don’t doubt challenges are ahead, I’ve seen a few, but the team at Solohealth is amazing. When you can sit down with the VP of Product and give some feedback and he takes the feedback and starts to think how to implement quickly is an awesome experience. The team is all working, with passion, towards the same goals. They’ve accomplished so much the past 6 months and I can’t wait to help keep the pedal down as we grow quickly. I’ve got a team to build across the country and a lot of people asking to be part of the national rollout.

My tweeting has slowed and my FB surfing will be cut back, but I can’t wait to look back in 2-3 years and see how far we’ve come and think about where we started.

I couldn’t do any of this without everything I’ve learned from my first days at Citysearch to the last 6 years at Yahoo. It was hard to leave Yahoo, it was a part of me, and always will be, but I’m excited to be part of something special at Solohealth.

Imbalance Creates Opportunity – It’s the Year of Mobile and…..

30 Mar

Yesterday I had the opportunity to join eMarketer for a discussion around “Digital Ad Trends: What’s Behind the Spending Boom.”  David Hallerman provided great insight and some good discussion followed.

It should come as no surprise that the growth is happening around video, mobile and social at a much higher rate than display ads.  A couple interesting things did come to light during these conversations that I thought I’d share

1. 64.4% of all mobile dollars are consolidated between iAds, Google and Millenial Media

2. In 2002 72% of all digital dollars were spent with the top 10 ad selling companies, the number in 2011 was 72%

3. In 2011 banner advertising made up 62.2% of online investment, in 2016 banner advertising will make up 47.7% of the market

So as a marketer, publisher or entrepreneur imbalance creates opportunity. 

From a marketer standpoint advertisers should be looking at ways to own the mobile marketplace, put an early stake in the ground and be a leader.  I realize this is a blanket statement, and obviously each advertiser must look at the goals they have and identify the best way to do this.

The other thing advertisers need to be thinking about is how to engage audience in new ways.  The early days of the internet we all touted how online was the most measurable media, I think many of us are regretting that to some extent.   Digital does offer other unique opportunities.  Look at opportunities that a company like Solve Media is providing, where you can engage audiences in new meaningful ways.  Even here at Yahoo we have evolved to where advertisers can now contribute to content, to give you scale you can’t get from your own site. Imagine taking your content from the 1-10 million users you reach on your site to the 174 million consumers Yahoo reaches ever month.

As a publisher you have to be thinking about how to grow mobile audience and drive share.  The fact that 3 publishers own the space tells me we have a lot of growing up to do here.  It shocks me that publishers haven’t been investing here.  I mean how many years have we been saying that this is the year of mobile.

Having been in online advertising 14 years I’ve seen tremendous change on how consumers engage with content and how advertisers leverage that engagement to reach potential customers. The pace of change will not slow, thank goodness, embrace the change, find opportunity in change, and use data to drive these decisions. These simple things will provide success.

In the coming weeks I will touch on some of the additional things that we discussed in the meeting.  Such as:

–          Programmed media vs. sponsorships and other media

–          Are we all in the media business today?  The evolution of content creation and advertising

–          Social, what is it to those of who are not in the media industry

–          What major disruptions could slow the growth mentioned above – Cost of Data?

Has CES Jumped the Shark?

11 Jan

This week was a week for many years that I’ve always looked forward to. The latest announcements around the latest and greatest technology. The last few years I’ve been able to actually attend the show and while I’ve enjoyed the experience I typically saw things that I’d either read about or we all kind of looked at and thought “What the hell?”

So this year Steve Ballmer announces that Microsoft will no longer take part in CES moving forward.  I can’t believe I’m about to say this, but this was actually a good decision, and one that Apple made long ago.   We at Yahoo actually have gotten more involved in CES over the past few years and with good reason.  The advertisers visiting CES now come from all industries.  It is a great opportunity to engage advertisers in technology rich environment.

So has CES jumped the shark?  After reading the Mission Statement from CEA, who actually puts together CES, yes and no.  At its core it still is accomplishing what it set out to do. Unfortunately this seems to be the route these type of conferences, where they are starting to become almost unmanageable.  I remember attending SXSW years ago.  This was before it blew up.   I remember hearing about Twitter at SXSW.  I can actually prove it, I started on Twitter March 23rd, 2007. Just put in dbonert if you don’t believe me

I’m sure other conferences are out there that are somewhere in their infancy that are set to explode.  Love to hear any that you are attending.   So will I be at CES next year?  Most likely.   It is still providing value, and well, it is in Las Vegas.  Although 2 days is enough for me.

Did Fox Just Create the New Model for Buying Advertising at the TV Upfronts?

17 May

For those of us in the advertising industry, everyone is aware that the TV upfronts are going on this week. I’ve been enamored with the TV upfronts the past few years and always interested to hear the latest ideas and offerings coming out of the upfronts. In recent years digital companies have actively participated in the upfronts and the process has morphed into something much bigger than TV.

Well today a relatively new idea was put forth by Fox. What they are calling, “a unified audience experience.” Advertisers will now have the ability to buy spots that will run on a TV show anywhere it airs — including digital sites such as Hulu. CW, launched the similar idea calling it a “Convergence strategy.”

At first I was thinking what a great way to engage your consumers on all platforms, especially around programming you think is relevant for your consumers. I do think this makes sense when you are looking at shows that have a passionate following around particular topics such as cooking and fitness, but is it really better for an advertiser to target someone who watches American Idol on Hulu?

Let’s use for example Ford who is a large advertiser on American Idol. Assuming all CPM’s are the same, would you rather engage someone who watches American Idol or someone who has actively searched for Ford, Truck or visited, or looked at trucks or did comparison shopping on Yahoo Autos? I think the answer is pretty cut and dry.

The beauty of digital is the ability to engage consumers with better targeting and ultimately better messaging in a more relevant time frame. Buying TV on digital does not necessarily get you there. The other part of the equation is scale. No one can argue that the ability to offer sight, sound and motion at mass scale to advertisers makes TV a unique opportunity, but that doesn’t always translate online. In a recent post on Video Insider the article talked about how portals continue to own the majority of the video online.

So has Fox put forth an idea that other networks will attempt to follow? I do think other networks will attempt to copy this method. Here is why I don’t think it will be successful:

1. Execution of advertising outside of and will be difficult to execute. AOL TV and Yahoo TV all are providing viewing opportunities. Does this mean Fox won’t distribute to other partners?

2. Targeting on digital is much more sophisticated and advertisers understand this.

3. Scalability off of TV will be difficult.

I think this is a great attempt and as viewing of shows off the TV set increases it will make more sense. What the networks should be thinking about is how can they work with advertisers help augment through digital. Whether that be things such as actor history, behind the scenes, alternative endings, bloopers and so on, that the consumer can engage with during the show is much more valuable. The evolution will be interesting.

Can Groupon, Livingsocial and Other Group Buying Platforms Drive Loyalty?

21 Apr

Three years ago at a street festival in Chicago some women asked me if I wanted to sign up for Groupon. What the heck is Groupon I said? Multiple Groupons later I’m a huge fan. But do the marketers who use Groupon like a consumer like me? Probably not.

I just had an opportunity to participate in the Mobile #AiMA luncheon where Groupon, Yahoo and Insight Express all shared great data on the evolution of mobile media. Each individual shared useful information on trends in the marketplace and how consumer behavior is changing rapidly.

During that conversation Matt Drinkwater, VP of Sales East Coast for Groupon, shared with the group that Groupon will be launching in Chicago an opportunity for consumers to choose what they are looking for when they launch the app. For instance you could see a screen with choices ranging from Pampered, Eat, Shop and so on. Groupon is calling it Grouponnow. To be honest I think it is brilliant for both the consumer and the advertiser. The example that Matt shared was that Subway wants to spike breakfast, you would choose eat, and then find a Subway offer that would need to be redeemed by within the next 6 hours.

During the Q&A the question was posed on how many people return to stores, restaurants or shops after using a Groupon. Matt shared that 89% of all advertisers would participate in Groupon again. Just a quick note on the economics of Groupon as I understand it. If you run an offer for $10 worht of product or services for $5.00, Groupon gets $2.50 of that $5.00. So essentially you are giving $10 in product or services for $2.50. I’m not sure where Matt saw the 89% number but it did get me thinkiing about my own behavior on group buying platforms.

I’ve bought numerous Groupon’s, Livingsocials, Hotdealslive, and others. In fact, part of my daily routine is to visit which aggregates all the deals locally from around the web.

After the individual posed the question to Matt a small focus group started at our table and surprisingly most people say they are a “one and done” crowd. I will admit that most of my group buying experiences result in me not visiting again. I’d put it at close to 75% of all businesses I visit through group buying I never visit again. On the other hand it did get me to visit places that I would have never visited beforehand.

Gawker had a piece on the love/hate of group buying which can be found here!5787645/groupon-the-business-owner-experience
The more people I talk to, the more people say that they really don’t visit or go back to the places that they buy the deals from.

So the common response is that running a group buying deal isn’t a good investment but other things need to be kept in mind. Here are just a few:

1. What’s the value of a consumer who doesn’t buy but is exposed?
2. Driving short term demand at a loss is still good if a certain percentage returns? (Each business should understand this when they go into the deal)
3. If a consumer spends more on services or product because they have a Groupon, what does that due for your business?

I also sometimes questions the businesses that run group buying discounts. Just this morning I saw an offer for Aqua Bistro, which looked interesting. After reading a few reviews on Yelp it sounds overprices and the service is not good. If the prices are already 50% marked up you are not getting a discount.

So back the question at hand, does group buying drive loyalty? I’d say the answer is not very often. The caveats are when the service or product is exceptional. Unfortunately my experiences have been good, not great. This is okay, you don’t need everyone to be a repeat customer. Do I think we are going through a fundamental change on how people buy things? Absolutelty. I’ve gotten to the point if I don’t buy something with a group buying offer, on sale or that days special it is almost a disappointment. I do think I’m an exception to the rule. But what happens when more and more people start to think this way.

Group buying will not go away and is predicted to be a $6 billion dollar revenue in 2015 from the $873 million it is today as reported by BIA/Kelsey.

At the end of the day I think group buying has a place for businesses moving forward, and I think it is a big one. The ROI will work in some scenarios and in others it probably won’t. Then again isn’t that like most advertising.

On a side note my good friends at General Mills just did the first CPG Groupon today. Looking forward to hearing how that worked for the promotions team. I give them credit for trying something different.

Love to hear what you think.

Advertising and Social, like Oil and Water?

17 Feb

It’s been sometime since I last blogged and a lot has happened. Some quick hits and observations.

While attending CES it became evident that CPG advertisers are beginning to value how Tech, Media and Creativity continue to merge.

The tablet game is evolving and opportunities to engage consumers are endless through this platform. I’ve seen some interesting studies that I will share in upcoming blogs.

On a personal note me and my wife are now residents of Atlanta. Hence, the reason for the tardiness in blogging.

Over the past few weeks I’ve had an opportunity to be part of conversations with marketers from diverse categories in regards to how social advertising is working. What they shared was that from a traditional sense, Social Advertising is failing to deliver on the success metrics they have identified.

So what does that mean? First when we refer to advertising we are talking about pixels on a page, not content that is advertising. This morning I came across an article from emarketer that highlights some of the trends in advertising and social. As you might expect click thru rates are decreasing.

In comparison to the industry standards and that of Google text ads this is quite low. The article does provide insight on how to create higher CTR. These are rather obvious but good reminders.

1. Make your ads social
2. Incentivize the Consumer
3. Lead with insights and make your messaging relevant

For those of you who work in the industry we’ve all heard the term social graph and many of us refer to it but still aren’t quite sure what it means. Wikipedia even struggles to define this but in short here is what they say, “social graph describes the relationships between individuals online, as opposed to the concept of a social network, which describes relationships in the real world.”

So what does this mean and how does it affect you as an advertiser? As more and more publishers connect to the social leaders and activate social on their own platforms we now have vast data to help tell a better story to consumers. Today, Facebooks platform is extremely limiting in letting marketers tell stories via creative. So what happens when you have the proper canvass to tell a meaningful story to consumers using the social graph and various other data? High likelihood of either engagement or CTR substantially increasing. Think of it as having a 1/4 of a page on a magazine versus a full page. From a personal experience what are you likely to remember? Imagine now having all the information to make that full page extremely relevant. New mom – Diapers, Like Twilight – New Movie Release, Enjoy Basketball and live in Atlanta – Hawks Tickets. You see where this is headed.

My title should probably say, “Facebook and standard advertising like Oil and Water.” That seemed a little long and boring. In summation if you can successfully tap the social graph and place it on a canvass that can engage consumers in a meaningful way the impact will be much higher then what you could get using the FB platform as it exists today Where FB wins is when they move advertising into content and it something that they have the unique ability to do, but by my standards have not done it very well. Earned Media will continue to see the increase in investment as exhibited in this emarketer study.

In the coming weeks we will discuss how people are engaging fans in a meaningful way. Today marketers struggle to continue to develop continues dialog with consumers but I have some great examples of who is actually doing this without just relying on promotions.

Check In – Dead/Local – Explodes/Ad Networks – Consolidate

9 Dec

The world is changing and it is changing fast. I’ve been reading all the year in summary and what to expect in the coming year. This year has created rapid change from platforms like tablets and social is exploding and was anyone “Checking In” a year ago.

So where will we be in a year and what will we all laugh about that we were doing a year ago?

Hyper-Local: I started in this industry working for Citysearch selling local advertising. Everyone keeps talking local but the execution has underwhelmed. This is the year the platforms are in place to exceed. Look for local to continue to explode.

Social: Sorry if you thought it was going away. Social will get better at taking the data and using it to really create a conversation with consumers. The data is there today but we haven’t figured out how to do it without creeping people out.

Branded Entertainment: This space is going to continue to explode. We will still struggle with creating good content and getting consumers to the content but advertisers will continue to push into this space.

DSP’s: While this was built for the DR advertisers, brand advertisers are figuring it out quickly. New metrics will be put in place that will allow brand advertisers to “justify” and expand.

Check In: Only 4% of all people actually are using a check in mechanism. I don’t see this increasing. I’ve said in previous post that I check in almost everywhere but I don’t know why I do it. Try explaining to anyone not in the industry the “check in” idea. They think you are crazy.

Ad Networks: Consolidation all around. We used to see ad networks pop up about every other week. The evolution of DSP’s and publishers getting better at valuing inventory will force consolidation.

Do Not Track: It’s coming in some form. Browsers are making it easy to set it up and users are getting smarter. We will start to see some of the effects next year but give it a few more years.

These are the highlights but a lot of activity will happen in mobile, video and 3rd party targeting. All of these will see continued increase.

What do you think the year holds?